Medical training is still stuck in the arcade era: expensive, basement-bound simulators and outdated software that rarely capture the real stakes of clinical decision-making. In this episode, host Alexandra Takei, Studio Director at Ruckus Games, sits down with Sam Glassenberg, founder of Level Ex (now part of Relevate Health), to unpack how game developers can modernize healthcare learning by truly embracing the craft of video game design, not “gamification” lipstick. The opportunity and the market here are much bigger than you might assume. Healthcare is a trillion-dollar industry in the US alone, and if you can create products that save the medical system money while also growing the $200B video game industry, that’s a win-win.
The conversation explores why even mediocre games outperform traditional training (the bar is shockingly low), and how live-ops principles let teams update clinical guidance fast. The pair also discusses who plays these games, and it turns out that it’s not only doctors but “normal people” who have found these games on the app store. They go deep on design: mapping real clinical challenges to proven genres (diagnosis as reductive-reasoning puzzles, ventilators as rhythm games), and why domain experts often describe what’s hard for residents, not what triggers adrenaline for experts, which is the source of “fun” in games. Finally, Sam breaks down the business: sponsored content by clients like Pfizer and Merck, free-to-play for doctors gameplay, and playable ads.
We’d also like to thank Overwolf for making this episode possible! Whether you're a gamer, creator, or game studio, Overwolf is the ultimate destination for integrating UGC in games! You can check out all Overwolf has to offer at https://www.overwolf.com/.
This transcript is machine-generated, and we apologize for any errors.
Alexandra: All right, what's up everyone? And welcome to the Naavik Gaming Podcast. I'm your host, Alex, and this is the Interview and Insight segment. Last year in November, this 2025, I had the privilege of attending Games Beat Next. I did a talk on all the things. And one of my favorite things about going to a conference is when you genuinely have the time to sit down for the other talks and listen, and learn something new, and not be inundated with meetings.
And this is how I met today's guest, Sam Glassenberg. Now, Sam was giving a talk on something really interesting on the border of ed tech and games of medicine, and I come from a family of doctors, so his talk really struck me. Sam is building medical games, games that teach doctors to be better doctors, and that are genuinely fun.
And it struck me from some of my own gaming experiences that medical diagnosis can actually be a very fun game mechanic. If you've played Do No Harm on Steam, you'll see that the entire game is just centered around identifying boils and skin conditions, and issuing serums and potions to those patients can be extremely exciting.
But I digress. Today, Sam and I are gonna talk about medical games, how to build them, the history of the field, who plays them, whether or not they're effective in their altruistic goals, and yes, how much money they actually make. Sam is the founder of Level X, a medical game studio that's gone through an interesting corporate arc, which we will discuss.
TLDR level X'S Life Science Businesses was acquired and rebranded under Relevate Health, which is where Sam is now. But Sam, welcome to the show. It's such a, such a pleasure to have you.
Sam: Thank you. Thank you for having me. Great to be here.
Alexandra: Yeah. I'm very excited. And I love the background, and if you're gonna be watching on YouTube or on Spotify video, there's gonna be some really cool visuals that we're gonna show, which I'm pretty pumped about, but—
Sam: Well, we're, you make video games, you know.You can't just wave it, you can't.
Alexandra: Talk.
Sam: You gotta see it.
Alexandra: See, as they always say, show don't tell. So, before we dive into our first topic, I want to know what inspired you to work in this field, because I know from your talk you actually have a great story, and I really enjoyed it and I resonated with, so I'm just gonna have you tell our audience about it too.
Sam: Sure. So, I mean, my, my background is in video games, so I used to work at Lucas Arts, I, I started my career as an animator, literally at Lucas Arts, flying spaceships for PlayStation 2 cut scenes. I used to run the Direct X Graphics team at Microsoft. After that I ran a game studio that made mobile and social games for all the big Hollywood movies.
But, like you, yeah, I, I come from a family of doctors. My grandfather was a famous doctor, both of my parents, aunts, uncles, I'm the idiot who didn't go to medical school. And—
Alexandra: I also did not go to medical school. I think that's the right choice.
Sam: Yeah. So, I have terrible stories about this I can, I can share another time. But essentially eventually, after many years, my father gave up and about a dozen years ago, he says, all right, Sam, you're too old to go to medical school. So at least put all this gaming nonsense to good use. Make me a game to teach my residents how to do a fiber optic intubation. It's this, procedure doesn't matter. It's a tricky procedure. We only do it on like patients with difficult airways. So, I, you know, he's seen, experienced anesthesiologists struggle with it if they haven't done enough cases. But he goes, Sam, I don't wanna drag anyone to the training center. Can you just make me a game they can play on their phones?
So, you know, I'm busy like running a Hollywood game studio. I have a day job, but sure. So out of guilt, I sit down for three weekends, and I throw together this like crappy little fiber optic laryngoscopy video game that, this is before the days of test flight. So, I have to upload it to the app store so his friends can put it on their phones.
So, all right, dad, here's the link. You know, leave me alone. I go back to work. I don't think about it again. Two years later, he calls me up, he goes, Hey Sam, how many people downloaded it? Dad, I don't know how many of your friends downloaded your fiber optic laryngoscopy game, but I'll check for you. So, I went on iTunes Connect, and sure enough, we had a hundred thousand doctors, nurses, and airway specialists who've been playing this now in the realm.
Like, you know, we make consumer video games played by 10, 30, 50 million people. But in healthcare, like this is unheard of. This has never been done before. So, I Google it to try to understand how this happened, and I discover, unbeknownst to me, they've been doing efficacy studies at hospitals all over the world, from China to Stanford, that shows this like crappy little video game I made for my dad is substantially improving physician performance.
So, I, you know, I would love to say that games for doctors was some, you know, genius idea, but it wasn't, it was really just an accident, you know, sprinkled with some parental guilt. So, all right, you know, clearly there's demand for this. Okay, what if it wasn't just me? So, you know, after my, the Hollywood Game Studio was acquired, I said, all right, let's bring together the top video game developers, artists who worked on everything from, you know, Mortal Kombat to Words with Friends, team 'em up with hundreds of physician advisors across every major therapeutic area to we say, advance the practice of medicine through play.
So, we've got now millions of medical professionals earning, literally they're earning CME, they're earning continuing education credit toward renewing their medical licenses by playing video games. And we're working with all the major life science companies, med device companies. The studios actually split, as we said, into two different studios. One of 'em works with NASA. It's crazy. We're having, we're having a lot of fun.
Alexandra: This is awesome. I'm gonna have to recommend to everybody to watch this on YouTube, 'cause this is probably the best like visual opening I think we've ever had on this show. It was like a little movie of, of awesomeness.
Sam: It's amazing. It's all, it's all video game streaming tech. I just like, this is all OBS all good things come from the video games industry.
Alexandra: Yeah. Well, I think even though you're making medical games, I believe you are the first person to ever stream me OBS on our show today. But that, that's amazing. And I think like, as, as very inspired by your father and his, you know, you're like, hey, he's like, hey, you learned something. Can you help me out here? And you know, this kind of like started your amazing journey into, into building games that I think have, that are fun and that bring a lot of value to an entirely different profile of gamer, which we'll talk about. But, you know, I want to talk a little bit about the market reality of the history of medical games before we get into sort of like the era that you feel like you're in.
But before we actually get clinical or talk about any of that, I actually just wanna ask what is like the funniest, this is not how games work moment when you've had a medical stakeholder like try to design a game. You mentioned that you were working with a bunch of life sciences partners. I bet you there's something funny here.
Sam: Oh God. I mean, we have, I just…
Alexandra: Pick one.
Sam: I mean, what's actually interesting, I've, I even, even funnier stories are when video game developers learn, discover how doctors learn things without video games.
Alexandra: Okay.
Sam: Those are the CRA when we do one of those, or we could do—
Alexandra: Sure. One of those. That's fine.
Sam: And then, I mean, you, the thing is the, like, what are the first assumptions about games to make is super, always the super obvious thing.
It's always like, let's play a game where you shooting molecules with a laser and like, it's all these very, it's the problem is it's obvious. Because that is what, the reason why this whole, the whole realm of applying game design and other disciplines or gamification is so stigmatized is because all of the examples are scraping the most obvious layer of video games.
The badges and the quizzes, and like slapping 'em onto boring things, completely ignoring the incredible richness and depth that is the discipline of video game design.
Alexandra: Got it. Yes, I would agree. And I think even from that context and then that's happening, that's pervasive. That's across like any kind of software tech consumer platform where people just basically, they use the word gamification, which is basically badges and slapping lo and like little like icons and that's like, oh, we're, we're gamifying the app, but you're not actually.
Gamifying anything in the true sense of what is the actual motivation and progression of video game design.
Sam: Correct. There's there's no depth there. And that's why like, you'll hear, you know, I, I run medical video game companies. I never use the word gamification unless disparagingly, we don't use the word serious games.
Alexandra: Okay. But like serious games, right, have been studied for decades and the evidence is kind of like mixed a positive. I think depending on the quality of the game and the outcomes, I think. I was reading that one large systemic review in medical education found the evidence was like moderate. And that serious quote, serious games were often complimentary rather than replacements for traditional teaching, or at least that's some of the research that I was reading.
And so, I wanted to kind of begin with, if you had to describe, quote, the state of the art and medical training today. What is broken? And this maybe goes to your point about what people are shocked about in terms of how doctors learn.
Sam: Yeah. I, I think the, anytime a study is done on, I will say a half decent medical simulator or game, the results are always extremely good.
Because the bar is ridiculously low. In fact, they've even shown that surgeons going into a laparoscopic procedure if they play any game before surgery. It doesn't have to be a medical one. If they play any game that like uses their hand eye coordination like a Twitch game, it'll improve their performance in the laparoscopic.
Alexandra: Dude, this is why my dad must have been such a good orthopedic, 'cause he used to play Halo with my, with my brother a bunch, though my bro, my though my dad would get nauseous like extremely fast. But there is that—
Sam: Well, that's a whole other thing. That's a whole other thing. Alright, keep going, keep going.
But, but yeah, I mean the, the, the state of the art in healthcare and in medical training is 30 years behind the state of the art and video games. And I have, there are just so many examples of this, you know, look in the video games industry. We, you know, today I can make, you know, for $50 I can buy a copy of Call of Duty, maybe $65, right?
You know, zoom into the eye of one of the soldier. This is what it looks like. Like this is what an eye looks like in a modern video game. Now let's sit down in front of a $250,000 eye surgery simulator.
Looks like it fell out of a gumball machine. I mean, it's like what? An N 64 unbelieve. Yeah. The people who are just listening can't see it, but imagine basically an eyeball in like Mario 64. That is what they're using. And the problem is not just that this looks like crap, but the, the problem is it doesn't capture the challenge.
It's just a loose kind of, it's basically an interactive video. It doesn't capture what happens when you do things wrong. What happens when you use different tools? What happens when you tear something? And this is crazy, right? This is. Two $50,000 and it looks worse than the eye we throw into a video game as an afterthought to make the character more realistic.
And not only that, that $250,000 simulator, where is it? It's, it's in a simulation center. It's in a, the basement. There's only 200 of these in the United States. They're in the basement of, of medical schools. And they're stocked with, you know, a dozen of these, you know, half a million dollar simulators. Now, we're very familiar with this model in the video games business, because we abandoned it 30 years ago.
Nobody goes to the arcade to play video games on some expensive physical box. You have more compute power on your phone than you had in all the sim centers and arcades in the world in 1990. And so, like we have all this amazing graphics, tech, physics, tech that we use day to day in the video games industry, that until Level X showed up, it was basically completely out of the realm for, for healthcare and it creates this huge gap. So, when you're measuring, you know, video against basically an interactive video, the results are not gonna be great. But you actually do something that uses just a little bit of video game neuroscience.
Yeah. And a little bit of that. You know, can we balance, reward and frustration? You know, challenge and skill, get a little dopamine, get you into the flow state a little bit, create a little bit of challenge, a little bit of surprise, boom. The results are always way better than the results you get from the standard learning modalities.
The way doctors really learn is through play, just like we all do, but they're learning through play on live human beings. Right? Because the tools we give them before you actually have to diagnose a patient or manage a ventilator or do surgery are terrible.
Alexandra: I see. Yeah. All right. And so, the other thing that I was thinking that was really interesting is that what do doctors do for continued education and skills refresh.
And in the video game industry games are meant to be updated. You know, we add rank, we add level cap. We expect the game to get harder. We expect to change the game to make it more fun. And I presume the same thing happens in science, right? Where new discoveries are made, new surgery techniques are made, and then you have to go back into that istic basement lab and re-update that software, which I'm sure is not designed the way that like live ops video games are probably not very modular.
And then you have to relearn those techniques. And so is video games. I, I guess in my mind I'm like, wow, like it could be really great to have continuous updates and the game that would evolve alongside the science so that doctors could continuously play one game and continue to learn new things and learn new techniques.
Sam: So, this is exactly, there are all these areas where video games is ahead of everyone else, not just, it's not just graphics and physics, tech and game design, it's also the ability to update content. I remember during COVID, we launched, I remember we had a game. It was a strategy game around how to intubate a difficult patient was in our anesthesia game and when COVID hit all the guidelines for how to manage an airway were wrong. If you use them on a patient that might have COVID, you would aerosolize the virus and infect everybody in the room. And so, we, as quick as we could, updated the game with the latest guidelines.
It took us only like a day to actually update the game because it's all data-driven. It took us a while, is the first guidelines for how to do this we're in Italian, because if you remember, the Italians were dealing with it first. So, we got it from the Italian Anesthesia Society. Then when the American Society of Anesthesiologists came up with theirs, we updated the game again.
So, we, I think we updated the game like three or four times in a period of two months.
Alexandra: Right, right.
Sam: Yeah. That's, that's standard operating procedure for a mobile casual game.
Alexandra: Yeah, we would pat, we'd patch every week, like, yeah. Yeah, absolutely. I think that, and it's so, so interesting because I think like so much of stuff like how knowledge gets transferred and people learn and update their skills is really slow and in games is extremely fast because you introduce a new mechanic, you do a new patch, you do a new challenge, and that would be weekly.
So, I think there's a lot of really interesting potential there. I have some questions though, like where games have worked in healthcare already. It seems like a lot of stuff that you guys have done at Level X and Relevate Health is, is working. And I know there are also many doctors that are trying to build games to help patients form habits, for example.
So not for the doctor's side, but more for the patient side. Do you see anything there that's been effective in the past about managing people with behavior with chronic conditions? And if so, like where does that evidence come from?
Sam: Yeah, so there's all, you know, there are many ways there are meant there's no shortage of problems to solve in healthcare.
And when you solve them, there's usually a substantial revenue opportunity. I mean, just a minute ago you were talking about C-M-E-C-M-E in the United States alone, CME continuing education for doctors is a $3 billion a year business of just keeping doctors up to speed. That's like $3,000 per practicing US physician per year.
If you can build games to do that, you can get them CME accredited, there's money to be made.
Alexandra: Hmm.
Sam: Same thing with patients. Like we're at the point now, the FDA has actually started approving what we call digital therapeutics.
Alexandra: Mm-hmm.
Sam: So, if you build a game that can treat a mental health condition, for example, or an eye condition, you can get it FDA approved and then doctors can prescribe it. Not only can doctors prescribe it, but insurance companies will reimburse for it. So, you're a video game studio making money like a pharmaceutical company. To date they've had games to treat ADHD. There are some coming out to treat PTSD.
I actually built one with my daughter to treat her convergence insufficiency in her eyes. So, build it. You can build these things sometimes relatively easily. In fact, I would argue similar to medical games, the quality level of the digital therapeutics that are out there are very low.
Alexandra: Mm-hmm.
Sam: Which means there is a substantial opportunity to come in and build better ones and, you know, you make a successful therapeutic.
The opportunity there is bigger than any, you know, AAA game title.
Alexandra: Yeah. I mean, it makes a ton of sense. And I think that TLDR of kind of what I'm hearing from you is like. Lots of room to grow baseline could not be worse. Right? We can only go up from here. And the TLDR of all thing you've said is that the form of the video games that, or software that doctors are using to learn or to train patient behavior is outdated and istic.
And you also told me in our kickoff call that quote, doctors suck at making games. And then we're gonna go into our next topic, but why do doctors suck at making games? Just say it out loud.
Sam: Yeah. No, I mean, why does anybody suck at making games? Because it's this incredibly deep discipline. It's like movies.
Anyone who watches a movie thinks they can make a movie and then you hand them a camera. And it sucks. Just like anyone who plays games is like, oh yeah, I'm gonna make a video game. I want to have, or if you ask, even ask players what they want, we've learned this, right? You can't ask players what they want.
What do I want? I wanna machine gun that shoots lasers and missiles at the same time. And then you build it and it's terrible.
Alexandra: Yeah.
Sam: Because that's not, game design is this incredibly deep discipline with this ridiculously complicated toolbox that combines art and science and economics and psychology.
You can't just, oh yeah, I'm gonna make a game. And even just asking doc, similarly asking doctors what they want can often send you down the wrong path.
Alexandra: Mm-hmm.
Sam: We built, I remember years ago, we built a gastroenterology game. And you ask a doctor, what's, you know, what we're trying to do is capture the challenge of their field as a video game.
So, you ask a doctor what's challenging about the field? And they'll tell you, for example, it's a, you know, colonoscopy. Right. What's challenging about a colonoscopy? Well, one of the challenges is it's actually kind of like a deflated balloon, the colon. So, you're like navigating this crazy thing and you're trying to do this procedure and it's a deflated balloon.
So, novices who aren't good at it have to keep inflating the balloon. There's like an air pressure valve you can turn, so you can push a button and keep inflating the balloon, but that's uncomfortable for the patient. And it means the procedure takes longer, 'cause you actually have to feed it farther down.
And so, we build this whole mechanic into the game with like this crazy physics where you can like, you know, pressure and you can inflate the colon. And we measure how well you're doing based on that. And then we hand the game to a gastroenterologist, they go, well, this is easy. We go, wait a minute. You told us this was super hard.
They're like, well, yeah, it's super hard for residents to learn, but once you've mastered it, it's easy. Wait, what? So, it's very important to actually, you know, when you ask a doctor what's difficult? They'll tell you what's difficult for a resident to learn, but to actually get, get her to think, no, wait a minute.
Mm, stop. What gives you the adrenaline rush when you see a patient or when you're in the emergency room or the operating room? What gives, what's the thing where you see it and you go, oh no, what, what's that thing. And they go, oh wow, that's, I haven't thought about that. And that's where you start really finding the challenge in the fun.
Alexandra: I see. Yep. Yeah. Yeah. And I mean, and that's exactly when you, like, when you read, like I've read A Theory of Fun by Ralph Koster, and, and who did Ulta Online? Like those are some of the tidbits of fun, art, controlled randomness, feeling like there's enough outcome that you're in power of, but there's something special and new that you were excited by that you didn't expect, right? And there's also these different kind of things that you put into the magic bag of beans that becomes a really fun video game. And yeah, exactly. I think you said it right, like the craft of making video games is a craft and being a doctor is not that craft. And I just wanted to say that out loud.
Sam: Being a doctor is still a craft.
Alexandra: Yes.
Sam: Like doctors are intellectually curious. They're lifelong learners. Like they are constantly just like game developers, they're constantly honing their craft. That's what continuing education is all about. There's a lot of similarities. But they're not game developers,
Alexandra: But they're not the game developers. Right. And so that kind of brings me to the next topic, which is, okay, so the doctors aren't very good at making games, but we need to take some serious games and we need to make them fun. Making fun products. And so, we need reinforcements to some extent. And you, so you founded a company called Level X that's split into two studios.
One that was focused, as you said, on survey and medical devices. And the other one was focused on clinical gameplay, which is,I believe relevant health.
Sam: Yeah.
Alexandra: And your clients, as you told me, are typically life science companies. They're not regular video gamers like in the market that, you know, I traditionally come from.
But where I wanna start is, is there's clearly something that needs to be done to make the serious games fun. And you've talked about a little bit of the pieces here, like what gets your heart pumping when you're in the emergency room and something goes wrong. And you also told me a story about how you helped your daughter's convergence issues and with, with her eye.
And, sorry, she was given some, I exercises that were boring. She wasn't doing them, and you made a game that would help her do her eye exercises. Can you like, describe to me exactly sort of like what that looked like? How did you actually like take that and make it fun?
Sam: This is the simple thing. We can also, we, you know, talk about how we fixed type one diabetes onboarding, but let's talk about eye convergence therapy.
Right. My daughter, I have a 9-year-old, you know, she has, uh, eye convergence insufficiency. So, a lot of kids get this where, you know, objects, when objects come close, basically things get blurry. You get double vision. And so, the doctor prescribed a, the eye doctor prescribed this, I don't even app. It was hundreds of dollars, 500 bucks.
And it was terrible. What? My daughter hated it. She said, this is incredibly boring and I'm not gonna do this. You have to do this, you know, like an hour a week or something like this. It's an investment. Mm-hmm. And so, I said, all right Alex, hold on. Like. I looked at it and I was like, I think we could, I think we could do this.
We sat down with, you know, Claude code and you know, she's nine. Okay. So, if you could have any game that you would play to do this exercise, what would it be? You want Pong, you want Tetris? She goes, I want Guitar Hero and I want it with Taylor Swift songs, whatever. She was an eight. Whatever you want.
Alexandra: That's awesome.
Sam: So, we sat down and we built it in a few hours. It didn't take very long. It's not a very sophisticated game, but it's actually fun to play. Lemme turn off the audio. It's actually fun to play like you wear it. We'd play it with 3D glasses. You put it on, and as you play this basically guitar hero game, if you get the notes right.
The images diverge. And so, you know, the, the game moves closer and closer to you. If you get a note wrong, it starts coming back together. The thing goes farther away to sort of keep you in that zone of proximal development and really keep you like, all right, get you to that point where you're just about pushing the edges of your eyes, ability to track.
And every week she would play it for, you know, 10, 15 minutes and play through all of her favorite Taylor Swift songs. And a few weeks ago, I took her to the eye doctor, she cured herself. Cool. And so, this is not hard. You can do this, and when you do, it opens, you know, you can fix real problems. This is not like you need, you know, hundreds of people and sophisticated labs.
Now obviously, certain problems you do, but there's no shortage of problems you can solve with the standard game developers toolbox.
Alexandra: Yeah. Yeah. Well, I think the interesting thing that you've done here, right, to our point earlier about gamification, which is kind of just like points and badges and leaderboard, lipstick, right?
Like what you've done here is you've actually, you haven't invented any of the design of this game yourself. You just stole Guitar Hero, which is a legendarily designed game, right? With an entirely interesting and new input system of the guitar itself that appeals to this insane fantasy of being on a stage and combined a rhythm-based game with that.
So, it's like your daughter already knew that. She was like, this is something that I already know that I like to play. I just wanna do it in this other way. And she kind of gave you that guidance. I think there's actually so much to be taken from there. It was because you don't actually, like you said, it's not hard.
Like you just look at some video games that have already been invented and made with successful mechanics that are consistent with potentially like. The medical space that you're trying to attack, and you would just attach them to something different, which is sort of what, what you've done here.
Sam: That, that is the exercise of game design.
Alexandra: Yeah.
Sam: Forget medical games for a minute. What are, what are most medical, what, what are most consumer game designers doing? No one's building game from whole cloth. They're saying, wait, what if I take this core loop and I take this mechanic from this game that I really liked, and then I integrated it with the story this way, and then I have you do this loop. That's what they're doing, right?
Alexandra: Mm-hmm.
Sam: Great game designers are great pattern matchers. They're looking, they play tons of games. They get a good set to choose from, and they go, oh, this, you know what? Actually this mechanic would be fun here, and that's what we're doing. We're not inventing any of these mechanics from scratch.
When we build, let's say a diagnosis puzzle game, that is a, like, that's a, a reductive reasoning game. It's not, oh, here's the test result. What does the patient have that's not fun? You patient presents with their chief complaint. You have to order the right tests, ask the right questions to eliminate all the, you know, not only figure out what the patient has, but eliminate the other alternatives.
What we call the differential diagnoses. Yeah, that's the puzzle. You wanna manage a complex patient over time. That's a strategy game. But you know, there are lots of strategy games that work this way. Rains and others. We didn't invent these mechanics outta whole claw. You wanna learn how to manage a ventilator that's a rhythm game.
So, we're borrowing those mechanics the same way any game designer would. We're just trying to figure out what maps to the mental model that you need of in order to understand how to manage, you know, how to diagnose a rare disease.
Alexandra: Right. Right. That's awesome. Okay, so, we talked a little bit about the pieces of how you guys take something boring and make it fun.
But who are the people on the team that make these games? I mean, I, you just said that you have, you had a background in, in more formal video games, and you brought that kind of over to this space. So how do you kind of convince people who maybe work in mobile games or PC console and are in the, maybe the trad video game market to come build games like this? Is that hard for you?
Sam: Once they see the games, then it's no longer hard, the challenges before that until they see what we're doing. It's all, you know, everyone all has a picture in their head of what medical games look like. Just like, this is why we don't use the word serious games. It's not because it's not a descriptive word, but because every example we can think of, sir, games is not fun.
Looks like. Second life with like terrible interfaces. But when you see what we are doing, it's like, no, no, no. This is the first time in like, look, let's say you're a game designer. You've worked on Call of Duty, worked on a bunch of different stuff, and now you're like, look, I wanna apply my craft in, you know, let's say, let's say a healthcare discipline before Level X, your options were basically, you had to compromise.
You had to say, all right, well I guess the graphics are gonna suck and you know, it's not gonna be real game design, it's gonna be curriculum. And then you see what we are doing and you're like, no, no, no, no, that's that, that's not how it works. Actually. We're using, we game mechanics, real game technology.
And this is the first time you can go and do this without compromise. We're using, you know, unreal Engine and like the latest Unity stuff. We're doing crazy physics and graphics. The gameplay is actually fun. And so. Once you don't have to compromise. We were finding it was actually, you know, relatively easy.
We were able to hire experienced veteran designers, artists, engineers who've worked on everything, you know, major console titles, worked on lots of mobile titles 'cause we wanna get a good breadth. Most of what we do is actually mobile and casual. And so pretty much everyone on the game, design, engineering, art teams, they all come from the video games industry and they've worked on consumer games before this.
The only difference is we also have a medical team, which is staffed with MDs and biomedical engineers to help the game devs out. But other than that, we look like a any normal game studio.
Alexandra: That's awesome. Yeah. Very cool. I mean, I would suspect that I think from the offset it could be difficult, right?
Because a lot of people in the games industry wanna build awesome and fun video games. And I have, I personally had the exact same reaction. I was like, you couldn't, you could not pay me any amount of money to go build curriculum, right? But when you don't frame it as curriculum, it becomes basically like anything else.
And I guess before we move on to the business and the market, right? Which I think is obviously we're a business show and I wanna talk about, you know, all the different kinds of business models and approaches that you guys, you guys have, but do you ever feel like ever there's a challenge maybe between the medical team that you said you have on staff and the game design team that is, that could potentially like, make, make light of a disease?
I could imagine that sometimes it could feel a little bit trivialized to play a game about curing a disease. I'm not sure if that's actually true. This was just something that I was thinking about and potentially like a thought about as a question that maybe comes up. When you're thinking about maybe some sort of types of games that you're building that might be fun, but kind of seem too lighthearted or too fun for the severity of the problem. Does that make sense?
Sam: We never run into the too fun problem. Obviously there's the treatment.
Alexandra: Yeah.
Sam: Meaning the game treatment. And that goes with anything. Like, if you're building a game in, you know, the Call of Duty universe or you know, the last of us universe, you know, there is, you, you can incorporate humor and playfulness and stuff like that, but there are gonna be limitations.
Alexandra: Yeah.
Sam: Just like us. And what the way we sort of think about it is we keep pushing the limit until basically the doctors tell us to stop. So, I'm going back to gastroenterology. Remember once, like early on we, you know, we had this gastroenterology game and we were like, you know what, we should port this to VR.
Oh yeah. And so literally we make this VR game. And the doctors love it. We put it up at the big gastroenterology conference and the, it's the crowd. You, you can't, we're in like this little booth in the corner and we're just packed. Packed. Why? Because you walk and there's a C doctor in a suit, and he's got a headset on.
He's controllers, and he is moving around like this, like crazy. And you look at the screen, what's happening, and it's an visceral experience he's never had, because normally you're doing this procedure, you know, holding this device from three feet away with your fingers, and now you're in the colon and you're grabbing polyps with your bare hands, and it's squishy and there's blood.
And they loved it. And they discovered all of this. Oh, yeah. And they discovered all this emerging gameplay. You could remove polyps, right? You're holding these forceps and you could remove polyps. And then what they discovered is, because it's all, it's all a physics engine, you could juggle them. So, these surgeons were sitting there juggling polyps inside a colon, having a blast, like playing golf, da da da.
And then at some point, one of the game developers said, well, actually, we added this cool thing. Check it out. You take the argonne plasma coagulator, it's a light, it's a plasma rifle, it's a lightning gun. You actually use this in, in real life. I can show you. And you can take the plasma rifle and you can point it at a polyp you've removed.
And when you zap the pop, the polyp explodes with this cool explosion. And so, the surgeon's like, oh, lemme check it out. That's totally not realistic. It wouldn't work that way. Why do you have that?
Alexandra: Hmm?
Sam: Really? You were juggling polyps 30 seconds ago and you were totally fine with that. But the second you shoot the polyp with the lightning gun, which by the way, you're also fine with, and the polyp explodes.
That's where we broke suspension of disbelief. Okay. Good enough?
Alexandra: No, it—
Sam: Future. But you see how far we went.
Alexandra: Very far. Very far. But I mean, it's like also know thy customer, right? Like, it's like a very different unique gaming profile. And I mean, as someone who comes from a family of doctors, absolutely. They are obsessed with skin conditions and picking and looking and checking and that's the kind of psychology of the thing that gets a lot of them going to some extent.
Yeah. Depending on what field they're in. Of course. And as I understand it, you know, it's, there's all of the different diversities of orthopods and derm people and plastics and there's all have all different like cultures and cliques, which I kind of feel like is akin to like RTS gamers and mobile players and shooter players and a bunch of others, different stuff.
So, I'm sure there's a lot to kind of explore there too.
Sam: Oh, they play differently.
Alexandra: Yeah.
Sam: I, I can tell you, I've measured it. Dermatologists have a shorter attention span than cardiologists.
Alexandra: Mm.
Sam: It's the, the game design approach that you take for different, just like you would when you're designing for different segments in the traditional games business.
Alexandra: Yep.
Sam: It's the same thing here.
Alexandra: Same approach. Awesome. Alright, so as I understand it, I wanna talk a little bit about the business and the, and the market, right? Because I think this is also something that was so interesting, right? You kind of said earlier, like, imagine you're a video game company, but you could be targeting a market and ret with returns like pharma, right?
And as I understand it, you are, you're, you are ad based, not premium, and you mostly do stuff on mobile, and you also have a lot of client funding. So, you're like working with someone like Merck or something like that to build something on behalf of them. So, can you walk me through kind of how you approach a client like Merck? Or do they pay for the development? How does that actually process start?
Sam: Yeah, so we, again, there are many business models you can employ, subscription premium. We are all sponsored. Everything we do is sponsored. Our thing for what we make, everything's free to doctors and the stuff we also make for patients is free.
We started doing that recently, and then it's sponsored by industry. So, the models that you can imagine for that are the same models that you would have in the traditional games business working with brands. So sometimes, for example, we have games, like if you open the app store right now, you'll find Top Derm and you open up, it's a dermatology game.
You can earn CME credit inside the game. There's playable ads, there's playable levels that are sponsored by industry where you can learn about specific, you can learn about specific treatments. And the same thing also we make as well, we make playable ads. So, for example, you know, here, here's an example I'm showing behind me of like literally an ad in LinkedIn.
A playable ad where you click it and then you're playing. A dermatologist is playing a game where they understand, we call mechanism of action. They wanna understand how a drug works before they prescribe it. So, we make video games where you can play with a drug in a sandbox and understand what's happening at the molecular or cellular level.
But that game just plays as a playable ad. So, we have a bunch of different mode, you know, sort of game modes that we can run it. We can do a playable ad in one of our games where we bring the doctors and then we could launch it out on LinkedIn or in emails. We also build party games. So, doctors learn a lot at what we call speaker programs or it's called peer to peer, where doctors go to a conference.
It's a lecture, it's a lecture format, it's death by PowerPoint. And they weren't a lot that way, but it's, it's boring as it's terrible. So, we come in and in the middle of PowerPoint deck, there's a QR code and everyone in the audience snaps the QR code and then boom, boom, boom. Everyone is joining.
Teams collaborating, competing two. Answer questions about clinical study data, diagnose the patient well, what, what's the next test you would order? And it's like a competitive game. So that's sponsored by industry because industry sponsoring the event, but it's using the same game mechanics. So, we have all of these different ways that we work with life science companies.
The other company works with med device companies to make games that engage doctors. Yeah. And that is a, that is a highly profitable endeavor, but there are lots of other business models you can employ.
Alexandra: Right. Okay. Interesting. And I, I mean, of course, I just wanted to discuss sort of like how you guys are thinking about your approach.
And I presume that obviously the way that you get more clients is you go to one of these big conferences and another, maybe someone from industry is there and they're like, dang, I really could use my next Relevate Health video game that's sort of similar for this, you know. Surgery thing that I'm doing, and we will, we'll walk up to you, and we'll say, Hey, will you come, we wanna commission you to build a game about spine surgery. And you say yes, and then you go right to it.
Sam: Exactly. I mean, think about, think about E three or GDC. Yeah. Now take one of those booths well designed with like fun gameplay. You got big screens. People seeing, oh, look at this. Get a nice crowd around it. Now, drop that into a medical conference. They don't know what hit them.
Like it is so dry and boring, and then all of a sudden, so how do we get what drives business? For us? Literally it's people from other companies digging their way through the crowd around our booth, around one of our clients' booths being like, what are all these people doing? Yeah. Oh, they're playing a video game. Ooh, I want one of those.
Alexandra: Yeah. Yeah. You don't have a lot of competition.
Sam: No. I remember once that virtual, actually that virtual reality game with the polyps and the juggling.
Alexandra: Mm-hmm.
Sam: One Pfizer came up to us once. They were like, we need this in our booth. And I was like, but this has absolutely nothing to do with your product.
We don't care how, how much for that we did. And we just saw their booth was packed with the virtual reality Pollock game.
Alexandra: Awesome. I, I've just, I've seen photos of medical conferences and this all, just, this makes sense. Okay, so how many people, so you, like you said you have top derm in the app store, right?
Like I could go download it right now. Yeah., How many people play this game? Top Derm, like tops?
Sam: Couple hundred thousand,
Alexandra: Couple hundred.
Sam: Five hundred. The latest numbers. But basically, if you look sort of across our mobile games, totals around like, I mean, there's 3 million people, but only a million of them are medical professionals. A little over a million are medical professionals.
Alexandra: Okay. And the other people are just regular gamers.
Sam: They're muggles. We don't count them toward any of our stats,
Alexandra: But, but, but why not? Because they're, I'm certain that they're, are you making, I'm sure, they're are making ad revenue. All of them.
Sam: Because our advertisers are like life science companies or med device companies. They wanna know that it's going in front of a doctor. Oh, your, so if a person is not a doctor, then.
Alexandra: Yeah. Okay. We won't. So, on your—
Sam: We'll not serve the a, sometimes we can't, we're not even supposed to serve, we're not even allowed to serve the ad.
Alexandra: Oh, wow. Interesting. Okay. So there's something on going on the programmatic side where you've set up your, you know, like I, when I make my account, I register that I'm a doctor and then do you serve ad inventory only to those guys and the other app they just get to play at ad free?
Sam: Yeah, exactly. And it's fascinating. It's, it's, yeah. And, and the doctors, in order to earn CME credit to earn your medical li your renew your medical license, you need to give your NPI number so we know your national prescriber writing. So, we, we have to confirm that you're a doctor in order to earn the credit.
Alexandra: So, okay. I have so many questions that as like a regular gamer, I'm like, wow, look at those 2 million people that are just looking there to be monetized. So the first thing is, do you make, so do you make contact with any of the mugles as you've called them? Why are they playing this game and what do they want out of that experience? Are you just a completely untapped unknown?
Sam: I mean, mostly untapped unknown. I can guess that it's people that are just interested. The games are fun. Some of them are harder to play than others. The derm game's really hard to play. But like our gastroenterology and pulmonology games are actually fun to play if you're, if you don't know the medicine, some other games are much harder.
And so, yeah, I think, you know, there's, people are interested just like people play kble space program. So there's definite, like there's definitely potential opportunity there. And we've also started making games for patients and those are growing much faster 'cause those have a, a, a wider audience.
Alexandra: Yeah, that makes sense. So, I guess in that sense, like you said that it's an opportunity there. Like would you guys, what ever want to expand beyond just like the life sciences market and just push on for full regular mobile player? Like clearly there's two thirds of your daily active users on some of these apps are just normal people having fun identifying skin conditions.
Sam: Well, actually one of the things that we're, that I'm, we're, we're working on is expanding this to help bring in more revenue for the rest of the games industry. So how can we get, for example, our playable ads running in other video games?
Alexandra: Mm. Mm-hmm.
Sam: And so, this is, this is a, you know, to just bring in more revenue for game devs who have maybe doctors who are playing or even patients who are playing, ,
Alexandra: Right, right.
Sam: And so.
Alexandra: Yes, you're, so, in other words, like you're, you may have a doctor that is not yet a customer of a Relevate health game. They're playing Candy Crush. You wanna service them an ad for top derm in Candy Crush.
Sam: As opposed to bib bubble, bubble bop. You know? Exactly. Yes.
Alexandra: Yes.
Sam: As opposed to, I mean, look, this is this great tragedy that video games generate something like 13% of digital engagement and something like 2% of ad revenue.
Literally like Fox News is staying afloat with all this broadcast advertising. No one's seeing it. And in the meantime, video game ads are, wait, what's the diplomatic way of saying it? A circular economy.
Alexandra: Yep. They are
Sam: Games, just promoting other games, there's no revenue coming in.
Alexandra: Mm-hmm.
Sam: And that's silly and we can fix that. And so we're working on it.
Alexandra: Interesting. Yeah, I mean it's certainly a, especially on the, I would say that that's actually, it's very true for the mobile ecosystem. Yeah. For piece of consult looks a lot different. But for mobile it's absolutely just a, they will, companies will, it's not even just other game companies feeding each other.
It's intergame inter companies feeding their own franchises back to one another. Yeah. Like, so if I, you know, a candy crush, you know, I might feed you Bubble Witch Saga, and it's the same, it's still king. Like we're, it's, you're cannibalizing your own revenues and you kind of have like a different life cycle of, of player as well where people might kind of migrate from social casino game to social casino game through that ads pipeline of yeah. Talking to, to, to one another. Which is interesting.
Sam: If people get nothing else from this conversation, you know, it's, this industry has all this existential angst now that we just about hit $200 billion and now it kind of feels like we're flatlining. We had this big jump with COID and then there were all these false starts with the nonsense, like NFT games and, you know, VR didn't turn out to what it was supposed to be.
And everyone's really worried, like, where's the future of the games industry coming from? And I'm telling you like the next a hundred billion dollars a year. As an industry is ours to lose because it's out there. Like you go solve a couple key problems in healthcare, forget not to mention other industries, but with video games there's a hundred billion dollars right there.
There is no shortage of opportunity. You just gotta, you know, apply your skills and craft creatively.
Alexandra: Yeah, makes sense. All right. And actually that's gonna bring us kind of to one of the, the, the later topics, which is kind of like the impact of, of Relevate health and some of the work that you've done.
But I think one of the things that you mentioned was that, that there's actual audience growth here. There's people that don't play games that are playing games such as the people at the medical conference doing the polyps or that thing that you were describing. And you make money, as you said, from solving medical problems and that a lot of new games in, games, traditional games is left pocket, right pocket, right. You're just sort of like tossing money around. I'm curious, like if you think there could be kind of a breakout hit medical game that reaches like a parody of like a dream or a super cell, like a, like a brawl stars or something like that. And if you had to pick a game category in the medical category that could do it, which genre and like what kind of game as a question of hypo hypothetically.
Sam: Yeah, good question. I think it's not gonna necessarily look like that. We say with free to play, or sorry, with medical games like the, the, it's the same equations as free to play, but the inputs are very different. So, would you necessarily get something that's gonna reach hundreds of millions of people?
Not necessarily. But you don't need to because in healthcare the spend is so high. The US alone is a trillion a year or more. The spend is so high that like, if you can get small changes in behavior. Even among, you know, type two diabetics or people with COPD or doctors diagnosing rare disease, or you can get someone to order fewer x-rays 'cause they know how to use an ultrasound.
Whatever it is, there's billions of dollars to either save or make. I would say probably the closest if you were like, what would be like a good mainstream thing? One thing I've always wanted to build is, something to combat vaccine hesitancy. So, I think, you know, we have all these like amazing particle puzzle games.
You look at like, frost Feed Me Oil, where's My Water? These games all hit like the top of the app store every time because they're super fun to play. , We actually use that mechanic for a bunch of our games, including for diabetes., But I would love to play a, to have a game where you're playing one of those fun particle puzzles where you know you gotta combine the right particles to get the right thing at the target.
And then all of a sudden at level 18 you realize, wait a minute. This game is teaching me how mRNA vaccines work and how they don't actually give you COVID and how, you know, there's no mercury and just help someone develop the mental model that they're missing. You know, I, we wish, I wish we had that during COVID.
I think that would've actually done a good job of sort of stemming the misinformation pandemic, right. That we were, that we were dealing with. But that's just one example. I mean, obviously if you can make a game that, you know, treats A DHD, that's gonna have, you know, an audience as big as Call of Duty, you make a game that treats PTSD or depression.
Alexandra: Right.
Sam: Or helps people focus, like all of these things.
Alexandra: Yeah.
Sam: You know, if you can do it.
Alexandra: Yeah. I mean the approach.
Sam: There is looking at Obama go.
Alexandra: Yeah.
Sam: Already did it. The Obama administration spent I think two or $3 billion, like to stem the obesity epidemic. Literally just to try to get overweight Americans off the couch to go for a walk.
And then all of those efforts were eclipsed in 48 hours when Pokemon Go got, what was it, 40 million Americans like walking for miles for months.
Alexandra: It was a time, but it's a great fantasy, right? If it fits in the ip, you're always supposed to be looking for Pokemon anyway, right? Like it's the whole like, and I think that's why something like Pokemon Go, you know, works so well. Where it was like, and, and you need that fantasy. You need the storytelling, you need the world, the world building to like have that like actual genuine motivation, which I think is why it was effective. But I think what I'm hearing what you're saying is that there's like one, there's a difference when I say scale of breakout, hit to dream or super sells, right?
Like there's a revenue target and there's an MAU target, and you're saying we can hit these revenue targets with significantly smaller MAU just given the, just given the edness and the spikiness of the, of, of how we call it size. We—
Sam: Oh, sorry.
Alexandra: I was gonna say like, because it's such a, it's a trillion-dollar market and some of these things are so needed, like the willingness to pay for some of those types of experiences is much higher than, obviously we don't need brawl stars.
Like, no offense, but like, you know, whereas like we do need. Tools that help us diagnose patients in a better way. And then also you're saying in addition to that, if you wanted to go to something mainstream, you'd have to basically pick a disease is maybe too severe of a word, but a disease of some kind that is large scale, right?
Yeah. Some something like A DHD or PTSD that a lot of people have, um, which makes sense.
Sam: But we've made highly profitable games where the target audience was a few thousand doctors.
Alexandra: Yeah.
Sam: Because if you're in a certain, there's a certain specialty, you know, and if we could just get doctors to diagnose this a few months early, if we could just get doctors to escalate therapy to this instead of that, like the outcomes would be so much better.
It's totally worth it. To build a game that may only be played by a few thousand doctors, but in the end will affect, will, will affect tens of millions of dollars in healthcare spend.
Alexandra: Yeah. And, and lives—
Sam: Affect lots of patients' lives.
Alexandra: Yeah. Yeah, yeah. Which again, like you now we're, we'll go to kind of like the impact of Relevate Health.
And you've told me that a lot of this work has clinical impact and so how are you actually like measuring that all sorts of ways?
Sam: Okay, so look, the whole reason this got started was because people started measuring impact of a game I made and didn't even realize it. Since then, we've just been doing one efficacy study after another, whether it's, you know, our advisors who love to do, they love doing efficacy studies to show, you know, demonstrate how, you know, games are this much better.
We usually try, there's like, there's lots of studies out there that show games do great. We generally try to answer interesting questions. So, for example, everyone assumes that games work great for the young doctors. What about the older ones? Hmm. You know, a lot of the studies that are out there are test on medical students 'cause you can recruit them with pizza.
But we ran a study a couple years ago. We, for example, a lot of our studies are, we did one in dermatology where the average age, I think was like late forties. So, to prove that once you controlled for existing knowledge, games were the most effective way to learn no matter how old you were. And that's exactly what was demonstrated.
So, you're able to measure this, you know, through studies. The other way we measure it when we're working with life science clients, for example, is they can actually look at EHR data to see how the game has changed, improved diagnostic and treatment behavior among the people who play it.
Alexandra: And, and what is EHR data just for the audience?
Sam: Oh, sorry. Electronic medical record.
Alexandra: Okay.
Sam: So, when doctors prescribe things, it goes into the medical record. When doctors order a test, it goes in the medical record. So, you can actually, on the backend, look at all the data and say, all right, doctors who played the game over the, you know, 60 days after they played, how did that affect how they diagnosed or treated? And it is in fact the most effective way to improve behavior.
Alexandra: I see. Okay. So. it's a combination of kind of the efficacy studies, as you've said with advisors, the electronic medical record., And there's probably some like in-game performance stuff that you're like actually looking at, right?
Sam: Yeah. Of the in-game performance is the most obvious.
Yes. Everyone, you know, you can see who's improving their performance in the game to diagnose, treat, whatever. But what we really care about is skill transferability.
Alexandra: Obviously
Sam: Yes. Oh, yes. I can get better at diagnosing the patient in the game. How does that affect my ability to…
Alexandra: Yeah.
Sam: You know, recognize skin disease on skin of color in the real world. Alright. We measure that now.
Alexandra: Yes. That makes total sense. As someone who's played a lot of do no harm. I saw an X-ray the other day and I was like, look, standard, you know, and it's like a terrible x-ray and I was like, hmm. Don't, don't know what that's supposed to look like. So definitely understand the translation to real world impact.
In the, I have a couple questions that are more like in the, like the, maybe the ethical nature of the, of, of, of this. Yeah. So are these games, do they get like maybe this is even a dumb question, but do they get like, regulated by the FDA, like or checked heavily. Okay, tell me about that.
Sam: So, okay, so first off, the way it works is any game that we make that's not sponsored or just, you know, general content that goes through peer review.
It's played just like any, you could publish a paper, right? The FDA doesn't review it, but it goes through peer review. Everything we, we make, is peer reviewed by doctors. If you're gonna get CME credit for it, it's gonna be CME accredited. There's an additional level of review that verifies and validates, not only is this accurate, but it actually closes a knowledge gap that exists.
So that's, that's separate from FDA, anything that we do that is sponsored by industry. Abby has to abide by FDA regulations, and that applies a whole bunch of what translate to game design constraints. So, for example, sandbox games are lots of fun. We cannot create a sandbox where you're allowed to use the, for example, a drug or a device in any way.
That's off label. That's not approved by the F—
Alexandra: And yes, I could see that being very fun to do but not make sense.
Sam: But, exactly. There's a lot of, like, we, you know how, you know how, uh, entrepreneurs or, or business people always complain about regulation? Oh, regulation's killing me. I'm gonna vote for, okay. We make, we work in a heavily regulated industry that puts a lot of constraints on our game design.
And every time we see one of those constraints, we go, ah, wait a minute, what is the bad behavior that must have happened that made this rule necessary? And then we go, yeah. Oh, okay. Yeah, that makes sense. That's why, why we can't have nice things.
Alexandra: Yeah. Yeah.
Sam: So it's all of these serve a purpose and from, from a game design perspective, it just means there's constraints.
Yeah. Just like any other, you're making a game for, you know, a, a major IP, a major franchise, there's gonna be constraints. Yep. Okay. This just applies more game design constraints. We're gonna have a game you play with clinical study data, you can only use the data that's approved by the FDA.
Alexandra: Yeah. And I mean, yeah, and I think like that's actually kind of the fun of game design.
Like, oh, like I want more enemies, but the enemies are taking up all the graphical rendering, like, can't do that. Okay, here's a constraint. Let's see if we can create that same fun by get around it in a different way. So that, I mean, that's really interesting and that's a, I, that is something I totally noshed and not thought about.
Like I imagine having a sandbox where you could just like all of these like little me, me, char like, we, like me meeps characters are just there and you just like freaking give them a bunch of drugs and just see what happens. Like that would be so fun, but probably so bad. Okay. Yeah. Alright. Next if you said that you work a lot with, with a lot of clients, so like a, an industry sponsored client, like a Pfizer.
If a pharma company sponsors a game, how do you kind of ensure. It's not like marketing for their products. Does that make sense what I'm saying? Like if it's like, let's just say that like Pfizer or, or someone has a very specific drug Yeah. And the treatment is centered around that drug. How do you make sure that like, yes, it's Pfizer sponsored, but like this isn't like a thing where we're saying like, Pfizer is the, the, the provider of choice. Right? Have you ever like, ever refused to build?
Sam: So there, there are, there are rules about this too, but even if there weren't rules, we still just like anything, any, so you're playing a game, right? You're playing say top term, there's a bunch of game content. Any content in the game that is sponsored by Pfizer, that Pfizer has any influence over, it's going to explicitly say before or after, during your playing, sponsored by Pfizer.
Alexandra: Okay. Interesting.
Sam: And that's just, usually, you know, usually that's required, but even if it wasn't required, we would do it anyway. And for things, for example, like CME, anything where you're gonna earn educ, continuing education credit, that cannot be sponsored.
Alexandra: Okay, I see.
Sam: So, if you're earning, like, there, there are all of these rules and all the rules serve a purpose and we abide by the rules. And that allows us to create an environment where you can be like, all right, I'm gonna play a game sponsored by Pfizer where I get to pour the dr, you know, pour the molecules in and play the particle puzzle to understand, you know, what it, what it binds with and what it doesn't. But I know it's sponsored by Pfizer.
Alexandra: Okay. Have you ever refused to build a client their game?
Sam: All the time. But usually, the reason isn't going to be some deep ethical concern. It's going to be, we can't make that fun.
Alexandra: Ah, okay. I see. There are, so there, hack challenge.
Sam: Yeah. All the time they go, oh, can you know, can you make us a game to, you know, there's no shortage of examples where it's just, there's no challenge there. There's nothing interesting there. Mm. And for this, you should just have a video or a slide.
Alexandra: See, I see you say go back to the old ways, get your, get your, get your death by a thousand PowerPoints. Got it. Okay.
Sam: But that's rare. Rare. Usually most things in medicine are scientifically interesting or there's some challenge involved because if there wasn't a challenge, then doctors wouldn't have anything they needed to learn.
Alexandra: Hmm. Alright. We're almost at the top of our episode and I kind of wanna close with like one or two questions, but I think on the, the impact of Relevate Health is like obviously like very clearly demonstrated as you've described by some of the, the games that you've built, the clients that you've worked with, the doctors and patients' lives that you've impacted.
What's sort of like your 2026 looking forward plan to make an even bigger impact?
Sam: Well, there's some stuff on the playable ads front that I alluded to a little bit, expanding what we're doing to create revenue opportunities, not just for us, but for the whole industry. So that's one area that's less sort.
Medically interesting, but more business interesting.And then we're continuing to expand in patient games. So, we just a few months ago launched our first game for patients for type one diabetes, and we have fixed it. The problem we, we, set out to fix. I'm happy to talk about that, but based on the success of that game, we are now expanding and creating patient games for a number of different conditions. Very cool. So that's going to be a big area of expansion for us in 2026 and 2027.
Alexandra: All right. And finally, for that big impact, to have that big impact, what is like a message that you would love to share to the gaming community, the gaming industry, and maybe even to doctors, in terms of like why, who should come with you and why they should partake in, in this 2026 mission for you?
Sam: There is no shortage of problems to solve. And if you can solve those problems. There is lots of money to be saved by the system and lots of money for you to make. So, and the toolbox you need to do this has been invented already. We have been honing it for the last 30 years and testing it on 3 billion unwitting test subjects, and that is the game developers toolbox.
Alexandra: Excellent. I love that. Well, we'll close with that. Look, Sam, it was such a pleasure. I have really enjoyed this episode today. I was like, I have to have you on the show when I saw you speak at Games Beat. Thank you so much for giving your time. This is obviously like very impactful. It's probably helping lives and, and patients all around the globe. So, thank you so much for, for coming on. And as always, if you have feedback or ideas for me specifically, hit me up [email protected]. I'm always open. And with that, that is our episode. See you next time. Thank you, Sam.
Sam: Thank you for having me.
If you enjoyed today's episode, whether on YouTube or your favorite podcast app, make sure to like, subscribe, comment, or give a five-star review. And if you wanna reach out or provide feedback, shoot us a note at [email protected] or find us on Twitter and LinkedIn. Plus, if you wanna learn more about what Naavik has to offer, make sure to check out our website www.naavik.co there. You can sign up for the number one games industry newsletter, Naavik Digest, or contact us to learn about our wide-ranging consulting and advisory services.
Again, that is www.naavik.co. Thanks for listening and we'll catch you in the next episode.
